Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- From: Scott Maxwell <smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:40:52 -0500 (EST)
Ah, when it comes to concrete, which SI metric do you want? <grin> There are several "flavors" to choose from which mainly effect rebar sizes and size designations. This is why ACI has such a tough time coming up with an official "metricfication" (real word? if so, spelling?) policy for doing their dual units in their publications (I believe that ACI's official policy is that all ACI documents are supposed to be published in dual units...i.e. Imperial [foot, inch, etc] and SI/metric). Beyond the issue of rebar, there still needs to be a consensus of what are the official metric units to use in various situations so that we all use the same stuff (not that it is that hard to move between various metric magnitudes). For example, if you do a cross section of a concrete beam, do you use mm, cm, or m for the linear dimensions? Some folks like mm while others prefer cm. So getting the "SI metric thing back on track" ain't such an easy thing...and that is not even starting to talk about getting entrenched, old fart dogs (which includes me at this point more than likely) to learn new tricks! <grin> Regards, Scott (who technically works for a Canadian company now who is forced to do it "our" [i.e. Imperial units] way since they sell/work a LOT in the US <grin> ah, the power to be unilateralists!!!! <grin>) Adrian, MI On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Paul Ransom wrote: > > Personally, I'm glad to see it. Now if you folks could get the SI metric > thing back on track ... > > -- > R. Paul Ransom, P. Eng. > Civil/Structural/Project/International > Burlington, Ontario, Canada > <mailto:ado26(--nospam--at)hwcn.org> <http://www.hwcn.org/~ad026/civil.html> > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** > * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > * > * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > * > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > * > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you > * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ******** > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- From: Gary Hodgson & Associates
- RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- References:
- RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- From: Paul Ransom
- RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- Prev by Subject: RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- Next by Subject: RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- Previous by thread: RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- Next by thread: RE: The 13th Ed. of AISC Manual
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]