Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Staggered Truss - Seismic
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: Staggered Truss - Seismic
- From: "Gerard Madden, SE" <gmadden(--nospam--at)maddengine.com>
- Date: 21 Nov 2005 12:24:21 -0800
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:22:44 -0800
|
For staggered steel trusses, I’m trying to nail down the R factor
for seismic. Per CBC Table 16-N, it appears that this would be considered “Special
Truss Moment Frame of Steel” due to the virendiel
(sp) at the middle. Is that correct? Are these treated as having a vertical discontinuity for the lateral
system as well since they occur at every other floor on the same column line? It appears that the hollow core pre-cast floor systems are the most
popular for these. Since the diaphragm is critical to providing transfer of
shear, are there suitable systems out there that don’t require a topping
slab or have some seismic shear values…. Just researching this option for a low floor-to-floor
story height application. Unless I missed it, W12 and W14 columns are still the only ones
acceptable for SMRF’s without testing, correct? Thanks, -gm |
- Prev by Subject: Staggered Truss - Seismi
- Next by Subject: Staggered Truss - Seismic
- Previous by thread: ACI 302.1R-96 VS. 302.1R-04
- Next by thread: Staggered Truss - Seismic
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]