Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: 'R' Values
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: Seaint List Discussion List <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: 'R' Values
- From: Reza Dashti <rezadashti(--nospam--at)hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:22:47 -0700
|
Thor, Try finding system(s) with the same "R" value in IBC, then find the Rd*Ro for the same system(s) in BCBC and go as conservative as you see fit. Check the deflections too. Reza Dashi P.Eng Vancuver,BC > From: vicpeng(--nospam--at)telus.net > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org > Subject: RE: 'R' Values > Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:24:45 -0700 > > Hi Scott. > > I'm familiar with the 'R' concept but was trying to see the equivalence of > our Rd*Ro to the US 'R'. > > Thanks > > Thor > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Maxwell [mailto:smaxwell(--nospam--at)umich.edu] > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:58 PM > To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> > Subject: Re: 'R' Values > > Hocus pocus. > > If I try engage my serious mode... > > R vlaues, in theory, are to represent the amount of ductility relative > to a purely elastic system. The idea is a purely elastic response > would have an R of 1.0. The higher the R value, the more ductile the > system will behave. > > Now, in theory, you can think of this a relative measure of the energy > of the system response or the area under the curve of plot load vs > deflection for a system. Nominally, in theory, a system with an R of > 5 will be able to dissipate 5 times the energy than that of a system > with a pure elastic response. > > In reality, R values have never really been done purely based upon a > rational method. The have more been a function of "politics" (i.e. > Kind smoke-filled backroom agreements). While they are not complete > BS, they can not currently be determined from a rational engineering > method. > > In theory, this is potentially going to change. There is an effort to > make R values be more rational. This part of the reason why Appendix > A of the SIP ICC-ES acceptance requirements was killed (this assumes > you read my long dissertation post on SIPs for lateral loads). > Personally, I have lost track of where this effort stands. > > HTH, > > Scott > Adrian, MI > > On Oct 5, 2009, at 4:47 PM, "Thor Tandy" <vicpeng(--nospam--at)telus.net> wrote: > > > Showing my ignorance of IBC/UBC through little use thereof. > > > > > > > > What makes up the 'R' value? I'm trying to align some Hardy Frame > > table > > values (quoting 'R'= 5.5 & 4.4) with the local 'R' for loads I'm > > using here > > in BC. > > > > > > > > No doubt apples & oranges . :^) > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Thor A. Tandy P.Eng, C.Eng, Struct.Eng, MIStructE > > Victoria, BC > > Canada > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** > > * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > > * > > * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers > > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To > > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > > * > > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > > * > > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you > > * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted > > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web > > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ******** > > > > > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** > * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > * > * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > * > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > * > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you > * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ******** > > > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** > * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > * > * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > * > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > * > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you > * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ******** New! Hotmail sign-in on the MSN homepage. |
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: 'R' Values
- From: Thor Tandy
- RE: 'R' Values
- References:
- 'R' Values
- From: Thor Tandy
- Re: 'R' Values
- From: Scott Maxwell
- RE: 'R' Values
- From: Thor Tandy
- 'R' Values
- Prev by Subject: RE: 'R' Values
- Next by Subject: Re: 'R' Values
- Previous by thread: RE: 'R' Values
- Next by thread: RE: 'R' Values
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]