Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: Re: Shear Flow AISC 13th Ed
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: RE: Re: Shear Flow AISC 13th Ed
- From: <jwhite(--nospam--at)megr.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:07:31 -0300
So, S = I/y when y = dist from NA to extreme fiber. > -------Original Message------- > From: Paul Guthrie <PGuthrie(--nospam--at)simivalley.org> > Subject: RE: Re: Shear Flow AISC 13th Ed > Sent: Jan 26 '09 20:08 > > Appears completely correct to me. My experience with shear flow is in > retrofits to wood beam members - which typically end up not feasible. An > important thing to remember with shear flow is the results are in force/in > not force per foot. This may be less of a problem in steel. > > This is a link for good diagrams and examples (ASD) > [LINK: > http://www.usc.edu/dept/architecture/mbs/struct/Arch213A/213A-lectures/16-Shear-stress.pdf] > http://www.usc.edu/dept/architecture/mbs/struct/Arch213A/213A-lectures/16-Shear-stress.pdf > > > >>> "Jeremy White" <jwhite(--nospam--at)megr.com> 01/26/2009 2:08 PM >>> > > Hmm. Right there in the front, huh. > > My derivation is based on the fact that Q = ay > a = the area of the member above/below the point of interest > y = the distance to the CG of the area considered from the NA of the > section > > Replacing Q in the equation with "ay" you get Vay/I. I/y = S therefore > Va/S, right? So with LRFD/ASD 13th you are to use Z in place of S. So you > get Va/Z. Is this completely wrong or a loop hole? > > - Jeremy > > > Quoting Anantha Narayan <[LINK: mailto:deviationz(--nospam--at)gmail.com] > deviationz(--nospam--at)gmail.com>: Look in Page 1-7 of AISC 13th Edition. It talks > about the VQ/I shear equation albeit for W shape with cap channels > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Paul Guthrie <[LINK: > mailto:PGuthrie(--nospam--at)simivalley.org] PGuthrie(--nospam--at)simivalley.org> wrote: > > > Not sure, not in the index, could not locate shear flow anywhere, is > there a specific section you know of? > Seems more of a textbook mechanics type deal > Paul > > > Paul Guthrie, PE > Building & Safety > City of Simi Valley > 805.583.6885 > > >>> "Jeremy White" <[LINK: mailto:jwhite(--nospam--at)megr.com] jwhite(--nospam--at)megr.com> > 01/26/2009 10:45 AM >>> > > > Is shear flow in the 13th edition of the steel manual still VQ/I ? > > - Jeremy ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- Prev by Subject: RE: Concrete Spring Constant for Base Plate Modeling
- Next by Subject: Re: Facing mistakes in structural design (a fantasy)
- Previous by thread: RE:Shear Flow AISC 13th Ed.
- Next by thread: Strong-tie
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]