Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: 1973 UBC DF/L design values
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: 1973 UBC DF/L design values
- From: "Jeff Smith" <jeffsmith7(--nospam--at)comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:02:50 -0700
|
Jeffrey,
Not sure if you got an answer yet, but this has been
discussed here before, you can try searching the archives. The consensus is that
you need to use current NDS values. From: Jeffrey T Flansburg [mailto:flansburg(--nospam--at)comcast.net] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 8:19 AM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: 1973 UBC DF/L design values We are
currently analyzing an existing truss that was designed and constructed using
the 1973 UBC. We are looking for wood design values from that code for the
following: No. 2
D.Fir-Larch aka DF/L No. 2
Dense D.Fir-Larch aka DF/L No. 3
D.Fir-Larch aka DF/L If
someone could post the values for the following it would be GREATLY
appreciated Fb, Ft,
Fv, Fc, E Thank
you in advance! JEFFREY T.
FLANSBURG
|
- References:
- 1973 UBC DF/L design values
- From: Jeffrey T Flansburg
- 1973 UBC DF/L design values
- Prev by Subject: 1973 UBC DF/L design values
- Next by Subject: 20,000 more engineers...
- Previous by thread: 1973 UBC DF/L design values
- Next by thread: When wind governs with No Seismic
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]