Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: 2006 IBC vs 2003 NEHRP
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: RE: 2006 IBC vs 2003 NEHRP
- From: Mark Johnson <markajohn(--nospam--at)yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Scott, Thomas, Thanks for the responses. I already have the IBC, although not the ASCE 7 yet. I now have the opportunity to spend a considerable amount of money for training. If the NEHRP, commentary, numerous design examples, etc. follow the IBC closely, that would be good to know, I could just use that instead. I know there are one or two (maybe more) people on this list server who were involved in writing these documents who it would be interesting to hear from on this. Regards, MJ ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: 2006 IBC vs 2003 NEHRP
- From: Harold Sprague
- RE: 2006 IBC vs 2003 NEHRP
- Prev by Subject: RE: 2006 IBC vs 2003 NEHRP
- Next by Subject: RE: 2006 IBC vs 2003 NEHRP
- Previous by thread: RE: 2006 IBC vs 2003 NEHRP
- Next by thread: RE: 2006 IBC vs 2003 NEHRP
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]