Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: 10"-12" diameter steel Pile embedement
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: 10"-12" diameter steel Pile embedement
- From: "Micayas, Julius" <jmicayas(--nospam--at)riverconsulting.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:47:46 -0500
|
Jay, Thanks for the input. This hesitation won’t
come up if I am using a concrete pile which I always have 6” + 3”. Now
that this provision still applicable with a steel pipe then so be it. It’s
nice to have 2 or more brain than one. Thank you once a gain. Julius From: Jay Kleven
[mailto:JKleven(--nospam--at)eapc.net] The 6" embedment is a rule of thumb for gravity-loaded
piles. Our firm has used steel pipe piles on several projects, and we typically
use the 6" embedment rule. An earlier response also mentioned "punching"
shear, which along with bearing stress on the pipe pile are more important
design parameters than the embedment depth. I agree with placing the reinforcing steel 3" above the
pile termination. Good luck. Jay Kleven, P.E. (ND, MN, IA, NV, MT, TN, KS, IL-Civil) Partner, Structural/Civil Engineer EAPC Architects and Engineers Direct 701-775-3006 Main 701-775-5507 Fax 701-772-3605 Email jkleven(--nospam--at)eapc.net |
- References:
- RE: 10"-12" diameter steel Pile embedement
- From: Jay Kleven
- RE: 10"-12" diameter steel Pile embedement
- Prev by Subject: RE: 10"-12" diameter steel Pile embedement
- Next by Subject: 2001 NDS column stability coefficient Kf
- Previous by thread: RE: 10"-12" diameter steel Pile embedement
- Next by thread: Job Opportunity
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]