Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
[no subject]
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject:
- From: "Jim Getaz" <jgetaz(--nospam--at)shockeyprecast.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:29:19 -0400
|
Thomas
Hunt wrote “Not necessarily for "design" but generally there
should be items in the geo report for suitable backfill material, compaction
requirements, soil testing requirements, etc. that would be specific for
"construction".” This was in response to Al Greene’s, “
I have an architect who wants the geotech report text to be part of the
contract documents for construction. I can see it for the bore logs and
tests.” This
is sometimes the only place where the seismic soil site class can be found.
More commonly, it is copied into the Structural General Notes. But it can hold
up design when it is not in the notes and the subcontractor doing design has to
request a copy from the A/E through the GC. Sorry
I’m a few days behind. Precast
Concrete Engineer |
- Next by Subject: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: California SE Review Workshops in SF & LA
- Next by thread: Old Canadian Member Properties
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]