Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: "New Footing"
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: "New Footing"
- From: Bill Polhemus <bill(--nospam--at)polhemus.cc>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:31:29 -0600
dnae(--nospam--at)cox.net wrote:
Under what pretext has the geotech made this determination? If it is because there won't be any more settlement, that's one thing. If it's because he thinks the local building code is "too conservative," that's another.I already advised the owner to have a new footing the soil engineer telling me " you do not have to have new footing"thanks for your comment in advance
The last is not his determination to make. ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp* * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
* * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp ** Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- References:
- [no subject]
- From: dnae
- [no subject]
- Prev by Subject: Re: "Flitch" Beam vs. Engineered Wood
- Next by Subject: "Open Letter to the Hosts of the 'Better Home Show' Radio Program"
- Previous by thread: [no subject]
- Next by thread: Retrofit Masonry walls
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]