Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: 1633.2.5 Ties
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: 1633.2.5 Ties
- From: "Jason W. Kilgore" <jkilgore(--nospam--at)leok.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:58:40 -0600
Reasons for no response: 1. The question wasn?t really easy. 2. No politics are involved. 3. The specific code wasn't mentioned. I opened 3 books before I discovered section 1633.2.5 in the 1997 UBC. Answers: 1. My opinion would be Strength design values, specifically because the word "strength" is used in the first paragraph, and almost all seismic forces in the 1997 UBC are in strength design values. 2. I interpret the second paragraph to mean that the (D+L) value is the TOTAL load on the beam. I also interpret that by "connection" it doesn't mean a SINGLE connection. If it is a single connection, then it needs to resist the total load. If the "connection" consists of TWO connections (one at each end), then each end needs to resist approximately one half the load, adjusted for diaphragm and drag forces. --- Jason Kilgore Leigh & O'Kane, LLC Kansas City, Missouri ________________________________________ From: ECVAl3(--nospam--at)aol.com [mailto:ECVAl3(--nospam--at)aol.com] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:10 PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: 1633.2.5 Ties I sent this a few days ago, got a notice it didn't go through so I'm trying again. Sorry if I'm repeating myself. RE: 1633.2.5 Ties & Continuity 1.-Is the result of the formula in Allowable Stress or Strength Design values? 2.-The beam, girder or truss ties requires V= .5*Ca*I*(D+L). Is (D+L) the reaction at the end of the beam or the total load on the beam? Thanks for any enlightenment on this. Macie ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- References:
- 1633.2.5 Ties
- From: ECVAl3
- 1633.2.5 Ties
- Prev by Subject: Re: 1633.2.5 Ties
- Next by Subject: 1633.2.5 Ties
- Previous by thread: Re: 1633.2.5 Ties
- Next by thread: 1633.2.5 Ties
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]