Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re:
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re:
- From: Daryl Richardson <h.d.richardson(--nospam--at)shaw.ca>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:27:52 -0600
Roger,
There were some gluelam failures in Canada about the same time; but, as I
remember (I could be mistaken) they were limited to one company and were failure
of the glue not failure of the wood.
Regards,
H. Daryl Richardson
Roger Turk wrote:
> Tom Skaggs wrote:
>
> . > The NDS commentary covers the topic pretty well. I'll paraphrase.... if
> . > the material is clear grain, check and shake free, "the tension perp
> . > design value may be considered as about one-third the shear design value
> . > parallel to grain". As the NDS Commentary further says, "undetectable
> . > ring shake and checking and splitting that can occur as a result of
> . > drying in service, very low strength values for this property can be
> . > encountered in commercial grades of lumber".
>
> . > Good luck....
>
> . > Tom
>
> This is the same requirement for radial tension stresses in GLBs, *except*
> for DF! Curved GLBs in a roof over a gymnasium designed by the Structural
> Engineer to these requirements (as permitted in the 1967 UBC) started failing
> in the late 1960s. GLB fabricators told the contractor that when *they*
> designed curved GLBs, they limited radial tension in DF to 15 psi.
>
> A paper presented at an SEAOC convention in the early 70s discussed this and
> opined that the presenter considered even 15 psi too high.
>
> A. Roger Turk, P.E.(Structural)
> Tucson, Arizona
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> * site at: http://www.seaint.org
> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- References:
- RE:
- From: Roger Turk
- RE:
- Prev by Subject: RE:
- Next by Subject: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: RE:
- Next by thread: Re: Engineers versus detailers
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]