Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
'97 UBC section 2316 comparision to 2000 IBC section 2306
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: '97 UBC section 2316 comparision to 2000 IBC section 2306
- From: utej(--nospam--at)attbi.com
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:13:36 +0000
The 2000 IBC section 2306 references the NDS for ASD design and I do not see any deletions or substitutions similar to the '97 UBC section 2316.2. The '97 UBC section 2316.2 states that "When using Section 1612.3.2....the 1/3 increase shall not be used concurrently with the Load Duration Factor, CD." It also revises the NDS table 2.3.2 to use CD=1.33 for earthquake and 1.6 for wind for members and nailed and bolted connections exhibiting Mode III or IV behavior. I could not find these deletions and substitutions in the 2000 IBC and in IBC section 1605.3.1.1 it states that "Increases in allowable stresses specified in the appropriate materials section of this code....shall not be used with the load combinations of 1605.3.1 except that a duration of load increase shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 23." There is no statements that I could find in the 2000 IBC that stated that one shall not take the 1.33 or 1.6 load duration factor increase in conjunction with the 1.33 stress increase such as the '97 UBC section 2316.2 states. Are these purposeful omissions and modification of design requirements in the 2000 IBC compared to the 1997 UBC or perhaps an oversight? * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org
- Prev by Subject: Re: "Zee"-Shape Purlins Resisting Uplift Loads
- Next by Subject: RE: '97 UBC section 2316 comparision to 2000 IBC section 2306
- Previous by thread: RE: question about OSHA steel erection s
- Next by thread: RE: '97 UBC section 2316 comparision to 2000 IBC section 2306
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]