Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: "OPTIMUM" ROOF SLOPE
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: "OPTIMUM" ROOF SLOPE
- From: sscholl2(--nospam--at)juno.com
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:59:39 -0700
well said. also greater slope makes for greater wind area and more shear is needed. Stan Scholl, P.E. Laguna Beach, CA On Tue, 22 May 2001 23:14:55 -0400 Roger Turk <73527.1356(--nospam--at)compuserve.com> writes: > Juan, > > There are a lot of things that need to be taken into consideration > in > determining what roof slope to use. Basically, the minimum roof > slope should > adequately drain water without ponding. Let's say (hypothetically) > that that > slope is 1:12. For a building 200 feet wide, the ridge will be 100 > inches > (8'-4") higher than the eave. However, if you raise the slope to > 4.25:12 to > take advantage of the lower live load permitted, the ridge will now > be 425 > inches (35'-5") higher than the eave. Columns near the ridge would > need to > be similarly longer (and much bigger), more sheathing at the end > will be > required and 6 percent more roof sheathing would be required. > > Sometimes "optimum" in one respect will not result in other aspects > being > optimum. One needs to look at the project as a whole, rather than > piecemeal > "optimize" it. > > HTH > > A. Roger Turk, P.E.(Structural) > Tucson, Arizona > > Juan Jo wrote: > > . > Dear Sirs, > > . > What is the "optimum" slope on a industrial building roof (truss > and/or > . > rigid frame)? I know from certain slope and down, codes demand > a bigger > . > live load. If that is the only point, then a slope slightly > above this > . > one is the "optimum". Am I right? Obviously the size of what > goes inside > . > counts but, what else? > > . > Thank you, > > . > Juan Jo > > * > * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > * > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > * > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you > * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web > * site at: http://www.seaint.org * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org
- Prev by Subject: "OPTIMUM" ROOF SLOPE
- Next by Subject: "Pre-Engineered" Metal Buildings
- Previous by thread: "OPTIMUM" ROOF SLOPE
- Next by thread: Samples Autocad Structural Drgs?
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]