Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
[no subject]
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject:
- From: "Satish J. Matani" <SatishM(--nospam--at)mcnengineers.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:09:49 -0800
- Cc: "'Cespenlaub(--nospam--at)martinaia.com'" <Cespenlaub(--nospam--at)martinaia.com>
>>Tubes (TS)
and Pipes now have a new name. Many people are not yet aware
of this industry change. <<
of this industry change. <<
Not really.
Pipe and Round HSS are fabricated under different ASTM. If you specify
A53, Grade B, then the proper designation would be STD, x-strong or
xx-strong, e.g., Pipe 6 Std. However if you are specifying A500 grade B
Round HSS, you should be calling out HSS e.g., HSS6.000x0.250. (Ref: Lanny Flynn, AISC and Are "You Properly
Specifying Materials?" by Charles J. Carter, Modern Steel Design, January
1999.)
One big difference
between A500, Round HSS section and A53 Pipes is the yield strength. A500,
Round HSS has yield strength of 42 ksi where as A53 Pipe has yield strength of
35 ksi. This can make a big difference in SCBF connection
design as the connection design is based on strength of a
member.
Satish
- Prev by Subject: RE:
- Next by Subject: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: RE: Redundancy factor 1.0 for single story wood framed?
- Next by thread: URM Design Criteria
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]