Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re:
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: Re:
- From: "Paul Feather" <pfeather(--nospam--at)san.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:59:37 -0700
A few comments: Is the wall really 35' high? Are there intermediate floors? I will assume intermediate support. I would not push the envelope of plywood shearwalls that far. I personally don't think much of the code permissible 2" both sides nailing no matter what framing member you use. I try to avoid less than 3" nailing like the plague, and prefer to use 4" both sides with heavy framing members. I know the code allows it, I just don't like it. If you have ever looked at a wall that has 2" nailing after removing the sheathing you would hesitate. There are points where a material or a design are being forced. If the solution is being forced and the numbers won't figure the answer is change the design. One of my favorite college professors would quote an axiom of "conservation of grief". The perceived benefit in one area is translated into a different problem somewhere else. If the wall won't figure, change the material, or add additional walls. Don't become married to a solution. Pushing the boundaries of design is exciting and creative, pushing the boundaries of materials is not always wise. Some of the most inspirational and exciting envelope pushing design solutions I have ever seen are using materials or combinations of materials where each is contributing in the way it was "meant" to, exploiting the natural and inherent strength of a material in its most efficient state. That is not is the same as asking a rope to be a beam. Anyway, some rambling comments from a tired man at the end of a long day. Paul Feather ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 6:03 PM > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 18:56:52 -700 > > X-Mailer: Internet Connect Webmail - http://www.inconnect.com > > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org > Subject: Plywood Shearwall > > From: Jake Watson <jwatson(--nospam--at)inconnect.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Cc: jwatson(--nospam--at)inconnect.com > > > > What is the most anyone has ever calced for a plywood shearwall? Can I use 3/4" plywood both sides and use values above the tables in the UBC? Will I need 4x panel edge members? > > I have a 35'+ high wall and need to keep it as thin as possible. Non load bearing, interior shear wall. I already plan on using LVL studs and steel boundary members. Don't want to use masonry. Need to push the limits, and suggestions? > > > > Jake Watson, E.I.T. > > Salt Lake City, UT >
- Next by Subject: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: Re: High-load plywood shear walls
- Next by thread: globalization
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]