Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE:
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE:
- From: Harold Sprague <harold.sprague(--nospam--at)neenan.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:17:16 -0600
It appears that you are using ASCE 74 which is a good reference document. Be aware that when the IBC hits the streets, there will be a new design standard for seismicity based on seismic spectral ordinates. I would reference the seismicity that the IBC will use which is basically the same as the 1997 NEHRP Provisions. I would also use the loading combinations in the ASCE 74. Other pertinent codes are the NESC and IEEE 693. Regards, Harold Sprague, P.E. The Neenan Company harold.sprague(--nospam--at)neenan.com -----Original Message----- From: Mullen, Corey G. [mailto:mullencg(--nospam--at)bv.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 1998 1:22 PM To: 'Structural Eng. Assoc. of Cal.' Subject: I am in the process of developing design standards for a client's future capacitor bank foundations located in the Mojave Desert. I am aware of the seismic zone 4, ice zone 2 ( 50 year radial ice thickness of 0.4 inches) and high wind zone considerations however I would appreciate some input. Thank You
- Prev by Subject: [no subject]
- Next by Subject: Re:
- Previous by thread: Re:
- Next by thread: Re:No subject given
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]