Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: $$ CHARGES FOR B &S PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: $$ CHARGES FOR B &S PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS
- From: Randy Vogelgesang <rvogel(--nospam--at)jps.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Of course doing a good job is proper, but when an unqualified person is checking they don't have the technical foundation to reconize good from bad. I guess by inference that if one gets unreasonable requests they are doing a bad job? I have found that locally the engineers that do a poor job encounter less plancheck problems because they simply give them less to look at. Randy Vogelgesang At 07:13 AM 8/20/97 -0700, you wrote: > > >---------- >> From: Lynn Howard <lhoward(--nospam--at)silcom.com> >> To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org >> Subject: Re: $$ CHARGES FOR B &S PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS >> Date: Tuesday, August 19, 1997 7:39 PM >> >> I think maybe our office just doesn't run into these issues as much as >> everyone else. I rarely get unreasonable requests from plan checkers ><snip> > >This is probably because you do a good job :o) > >Regards, >Bill Allen > > > >
- Prev by Subject: Re: $$ CHARGES FOR B &S PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS
- Next by Subject: Re: $$ CHARGES FOR B &S PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS
- Previous by thread: Re: $$ CHARGES FOR B &S PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS
- Next by thread: Re: $$ CHARGES FOR B &S PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]